Home > Pool Topics > Leases &
surveysLeases & surveys
From the late nineteenth century, the NSW government tried to formalise leases
for the ocean baths. This process could take years as was the case with
Wollongong Council's lease for its long-established ocean baths. Several
pools required two different types of leases; one for the area above the
high water mark and one for the area below the high water mark.
In some cases, there was considerable confusion over the site of the pool
leases. At Kiama's Pheasant Point, the government surveyor had pegged out
the site of the baths, but the official records showed the pool which was
sited on a rock platform at the base of a 60 foot cliff and submerged at high
tide as forming part of a suburban street.
Even for long-established leases, survey information was not always
reliable, as Randwick Council discovered in the 1940s, when it sought details
of the precise boundary of the area it leased for McIvers Baths at Coogee.
Usually pool
leases were granted to councils, which might then sublease the baths to an
operator. This was initially the case with Waverley Council and its Bondi and
Bronte Baths and Randwick's men's and women's baths at Coogee. At Coogee, H. A. Wylie
had a lease directly from the NSW government for Wylies Baths.
Because the baths were not on freehold land, the NSW government could have a
significant impact on the management of the baths. At Coogee, the NSW Minister
for Lands was unwilling to extend Randwick Council's lease on the Ladies
Baths in 1901, because he considered that the charges required by council from
private operators were too high.
In the late twentieth century, difficulties in resolving the lease to Randwick
Council of Wylies Baths at Coogee retarded the renovation of those baths.
Further Information
|
|